276 words by a whitespace count. This teaching example has an AI-estimated band, not an official examiner score. Read the commentary, then attempt the question yourself.
“Genetic engineering is increasingly used to modify food crops. Is this a positive or negative development?”Model answer
276 wordsP1The application of genetic engineering to food crops has become one of the most contested issues in modern agriculture. In my view, this is broadly a positive development, provided it is accompanied by rigorous scientific oversight and transparent regulation.
P2The most compelling argument in favour of genetically modified crops is their potential to address food insecurity. Scientists have developed varieties that produce higher yields, tolerate drought, and resist common pests without heavy pesticide application. Golden Rice, for instance, was engineered to produce beta-carotene, which the body can convert into vitamin A, targeting deficiency-related blindness in regions where the condition remains a significant public-health problem. Such innovations can reduce suffering in ways that conventional breeding would take decades to achieve.
P3Furthermore, GM technology can reduce agriculture's environmental footprint. Crops engineered for insect resistance require fewer chemical treatments, which lessens the contamination of soil and waterways. In cotton-producing regions of South Asia, the adoption of pest-resistant varieties has been linked to substantial reductions in pesticide use, benefiting both farmers' health and surrounding ecosystems.
Write your answer in the exam workspace and see how your four marks compare to the model’s.
P4Critics, however, raise legitimate concerns. There is ongoing debate about the long-term ecological effects of introducing engineered organisms, particularly the possibility that modified genes could spread to wild plant populations through cross-pollination. Corporate control over seed patents also threatens the economic independence of smallholder farmers, who may become dependent on a handful of large biotechnology companies.
P5These concerns deserve serious policy attention, but they are arguments for careful governance rather than outright rejection of the technology. On balance, genetic engineering offers transformative benefits for nutrition, agricultural productivity, and environmental sustainability. With strong international regulation and equitable access provisions, it represents a net gain for humanity.