WWriteClimb.
QuestionsSample reportPricing
Sign inCheck my writing
Check writingWrite
WWriteClimb.

AI practice feedback for IELTS Writing Task 1 and Task 2. Band estimates, criterion explanations and selected corrections.

Grade an essay Browse questions

Task 2 questions

  • Opinion (agree/disagree)
  • Discuss both views
  • Problem & solution
  • Advantages / disadvantages
  • Two-part questions

Task 1 questions

  • Bar chart
  • Line graph
  • Pie chart
  • Table
  • Process diagram
  • Map

Product

  • Grade an essay
  • All questions
  • Browse by theme
  • Practice by band
  • Grammar drills
  • Vocabulary drills
  • Coherence drills
  • Task Response drills
  • Band score calculator
  • Demo
  • Blog
  • Sample essays
  • Pricing

Company & legal

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Refunds
  • DMCA
Owned & operated by FrostPeak Ventures LLC · Wyoming, USA
Independent. Not affiliated with British Council, IDP, or Cambridge Assessment English.
© 2026 WriteClimb · Made for students
← HomeCheck my own writing

Fixed example · Task 2

See how the feedback works.

This illustrative report is the same for every visitor. Explore the explanations, then try the analyser with your own answer.

214 words

AI practice estimate

6.5 / 9

For this answer only

An AI estimate can differ from an examiner’s judgement. This single answer does not establish your overall IELTS Writing score or guarantee a future band.

A starting point for revision

Focus on Lexical Resource.

This is the lowest criterion in this report. Use its explanation and examples to decide what to change.

A reasonable range for the topic, held back by collocation slips (“make a damage”) and an informal register choice (“kids”) that can weaken precision and consistency of register.

Practise collocations

Suggested practice based on this criterion. Review the explanations alongside the exercises.

The four criteria

Task Response

6.5

Your position is clear and you stay on topic. The third paragraph introduces a counter-argument; connect it more explicitly to your main claim and develop the supporting reasons in more depth.

Coherence & Cohesion

7.0

Four clear paragraphs, each with a topic sentence. But you open two back-to-back sentences with “Moreover” and “Furthermore” — vary or cut one — and a few links feel mechanical rather than meaningful.

Lexical Resource

6.0

A reasonable range for the topic, held back by collocation slips (“make a damage”) and an informal register choice (“kids”) that can weaken precision and consistency of register.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

6.5

You mix simple and complex sentences well, but subject–verb agreement (“people is”) and the fixed phrase “Despite of” reduce the accuracy of these sentences.

Sample answer

The question

Some people believe that smartphones are damaging social interaction. Do you agree or disagree?

Highlights are buttons. Select one to find its correction, or read the complete list beside the answer.

Nowadays, smartphones have become a central part of daily life, and many people worry about their effect on the way we communicate. I agree that these devices can to real social interaction, although they also bring some benefits. This essay will explain why I mostly agree with this view. Firstly, when using their phones, they often ignore the people who are sitting next to them. For example, in many restaurants families look at their screens instead of talking to each other, and this slowly reduces the quality of their relationships. Face-to-face conversation is disappearing from ordinary, everyday situations. Moreover, social skills can become weaker because young people spend less time practising them in person. , constant notifications make it hard to focus on a single conversation for long. , some people argue that smartphones help us stay close to friends and family who live far away. It is true that today can call their grandparents easily, but this does not fully replace real contact. these advantages, I believe the negative effects are stronger. In conclusion, smartphones are damaging social interaction because they reduce the time and attention people give to those around them, and society should encourage a more balanced use of technology.

Selected corrections

6 corrections in this report. The list is not an exhaustive check of every error.

Select a highlighted passage or correction.

Put the feedback into practice

Revise with a clear focus.

Use the explanations to make your own changes. The rewrite below is an example to study.

Compare the paragraph rewrite

Original paragraph

Moreover, social skills can become weaker because young people spend less time practising them in person. Furthermore, constant notifications make it hard to focus on a single conversation for long. On the other hand, some people argue that smartphones help us stay close to friends and family who live far away. It is true that kids today can call their grandparents easily, but this does not fully replace real contact.

Example rewrite

Beyond single moments, smartphones may be weakening the social skills that face-to-face contact once built, as young people now practise conversation far less in person and constant notifications fracture their attention. Admittedly, these devices help us stay close to relatives who live far away, and a quick video call to a grandparent is no small thing. Yet this convenience supplements real contact rather than replacing it, and on balance the everyday losses outweigh it.

Holds a single position instead of conceding mid-paragraph, replaces the doubled linkers, lifts the register (“young people”, not “kids”), and keeps the counter-argument brief before rebutting it.

Check my own writing